12
£
stopping a threatened strike among some men supplied by him to the Taikoo Sugar Refinery, and he had made the arrange- ments for feeding certain casual labour supplied to the Refinery by the Government. It was probably for these
reasons that he was selected as an example by the leaders
of the strike.
7.
Intimidation and fear seem to have been
active also in connection with the trial of the case. A
common jury panel was drawn for the March Sessions generally
One of the two Chinese jurors on that panel at once
received a threatening letter. A special jury panel was
dram for the murder case. It may have been a coincidence,
but one of the two Chinese jurors on that panel thereupon
applied for exemption. The other Chinese juror was also
excused, on the ground that he had taken some part in the
strike negotiations. Mr. Ho Cheuk, a witness who was
instrumental in the recovery of the revolver, received
immediately after the murder an anonymous letter which was
obviously intended as a threat. The ricksha coolie who
told Mr. Ho Cheuk about the revolver denied all knowledge
of the incident next day. The witness Fung Chi altered his story between the 24th February and the date of the hearing at the Police Court. The Police could find no witness from
the Prince of Wales Pavilion who was willing to give evidence: the defence were more fortunate. A joint manager of the deceased's firm refused to go into the box to prove
the notorious fact that the firm had acted as stevedores
for certain ships which sailed during the strike.
The special jurors who tried the case were
|
the following:-
H. W. Bird
A. S. Gubbay
A leading local architect, and recently a member of the Legislative Council.
Manager in Hongkong of E. D. Sassoon & Co. Ltd.: has been a member of the Court of the Hongkong & Shanghai Banking Corporation.
W. B. Walker
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.